Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] USB: Gadget: Add Samsung S3C24XX USB High-Speed controller driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:35:43AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Heiko [iso-8859-1] St?bner wrote:
> 
> > From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The Samsung's S3C2416, S3C2443 and S3C2450 includes a USB High-Speed
> > device controller module. This driver enables support for USB high-speed
> > gadget functionality for the Samsung S3C24xx SoC's that include this
> > controller.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Neumann <alexander@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> ...
> 
> > +static struct usb_ep_ops s3c_hsudc_ep_ops = {
> > +	.enable = s3c_hsudc_ep_enable,
> > +	.disable = s3c_hsudc_ep_disable,
> > +	.alloc_request = s3c_hsudc_alloc_request,
> > +	.free_request = s3c_hsudc_free_request,
> > +	.queue = s3c_hsudc_queue,
> > +	.dequeue = s3c_hsudc_dequeue,
> > +	.set_halt = s3c_hsudc_set_halt,
> > +};
> 
> There's no .set_wedge method.  Why do people always leave this out?

Does the code spit out a nasty warning if this isn't set?  If not, I
would suggest adding it so that this doesn't keep happening.

Or just refuse to be able to register the structure, that would stop it
right away :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux