On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 02:36:24PM -0700, Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote: > Is there a general objection to moving to a threaded irq other > than it needs to be tested? From my reading threaded irqs can > provide some benefit besides just allowing me to sleep while > resuming :). No, I would like to move to a threaded irq eventually for USB as it would make the RT people much happier. It is the right thing to do, and if you want to push for it, I have no objection. But we should make that change independant of your resume issues so it gets good testing. > You could also allow other drivers to allocate the irq (rather > than doing it in hcd.c), which would let them chose whether to be > threaded or not. That would get messy, I'd prefer to just do it all at once instead of waiting for the individual host controllers to have to enable it as odds are some never will be changed and no one will remember why they didn't. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
