> -----Original Message----- > From: Sarah Sharp [mailto:sarah.a.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2011 6:38 AM > To: Xu, Andiry > Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] USB3 hub support refine > > On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 05:11:42PM +0800, Andiry Xu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since USB3.0 hub support has been merged into usb-next, now USB3 root > > hub and USB2 root hub are separated and USB3 root hub only has USB3 > > protocol ports. This makes it easy to separate USB3 ports from USB2 > > ports, and it's time to make USB3 root hub works comply with USB3.0 > > specification. > > > > This patchset is based on usb-next, adds three set/clear port feature > > request support to xhci hub control, report wPortStatus and wPortChange > > of USB3 ports comply with USB3.0 specification, and fixes the bug that > > USB3.0 device can not be suspended when connected to a USB3.0 external > > hub. > > > > Basic test of USB1.1/2.0/3.0 devices connected to USB3.0 root/external > > hub, system suspend/resume passed. > > If you (and Greg) doesn't mind, I'd like to queue these patches for > 2.6.39, rather than 2.6.40. There are several OSV that are complaining > that the USB 3.0 hub patches break suspend when a USB 3.0 device is > plugged in behind a USB 3.0 hub. As Alan Stern pointed out, Linus > really doesn't want new functionality to break suspend. So although > these patches are larger, I think they need to get into 2.6.39. > > I don't think there's anything you need to do, Andiry, since Greg's > usb-linus and usb-next are currently pointing to the same commit. > Thanks. I'll have a v2 of this patchset sent today, modified based on Alan and Sergei's suggestions. Thanks, Andiry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
