Re: cdc_acm and sam_ba support the same device

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 09:49:26PM +0100, Sven Köhler wrote:
> Am 16.03.2011 20:34, schrieb Greg KH:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 07:28:25PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 08:23:11AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 03:48:53PM +0100, Sven Köhler wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure, whether you consider this is an issue. However, the device
> >>>> I have (Lego NXT in SAM-BA mode, lsusb shows it as 03eb:6124 Atmel Corp.
> >>>> at91sam SAMBA bootloader) is supported by both cdc_acm and sam_ba kernel
> >>>> modules, which leads to unpredictable behaviour.
> >>>> (Tested 2.6.38 - same issue in 2.6.37)
> >>>
> >>> I think Johan is the best one to answer this, as he submitted the sam-ba
> >>> driver.
> >>>
> >>> Johan, any thoughts on the below info?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> If I plug the device in, the following happens if cdc_acm is already loaded:
> >>>>> usb 4-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 3
> >>>>> cdc_acm 4-1:1.0: This device cannot do calls on its own. It is not a modem.
> >>>>> cdc_acm 4-1:1.0: ttyACM0: USB ACM device
> >>>>> usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_acm
> >>>>> cdc_acm: v0.26:USB Abstract Control Model driver for USB modems and ISDN adapters
> >>>>> USB Serial support registered for sam-ba
> >>>>> usbcore: registered new interface driver sam-ba
> >>>>> sam_ba: v1.0: Atmel SAM Boot Assistant (SAM-BA) driver
> >>>>
> >>>> After unloading both cdc_acm and sam_ba, the following happends:
> >>>>> usb 4-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and address 4
> >>>>> USB Serial support registered for sam-ba
> >>>>> sam-ba 4-1:1.1: sam-ba converter detected
> >>>>> usb 4-1: sam-ba converter now attached to ttyUSB0
> >>>>> usbcore: registered new interface driver sam-ba
> >>>>> sam_ba: v1.0: Atmel SAM Boot Assistant (SAM-BA) driver
> >>>>> cdc_acm 4-1:1.0: This device cannot do calls on its own. It is not a modem.
> >>>>> cdc_acm: probe of 4-1:1.0 failed with error -16
> >>>>> usbcore: registered new interface driver cdc_acm
> >>>>> cdc_acm: v0.26:USB Abstract Control Model driver for USB modems and ISDN adapters
> >>>>
> >>>> As you can see, the device is recognized by cdc_acm as well as sam_ba.
> >>>> Depending on which module is loaded, the device is either claimed by
> >>>> cdc_acm or sam_ba. The device name may be either ttyACM* or ttyUSB*
> >>
> >> Tradionally the generic usb-serial driver was used to access the SAM-BA
> >> boot application; this is documented in the Atmel tools, which also
> >> expect the device to show up as a ttyUSBx node. Due to changes in the
> >> generic driver the tools stopped working from 2.6.32 and a dedicated
> >> driver was later written (sam-ba).
> >>
> >> A couple of weeks after the sam-ba driver was submitted, however,
> >> 5b239f0aebd4dd6f85b13decf5e18e86e35d57f0 (USB: cdc-acm: Add pseudo modem
> >> without AT command capabilities) was submitted, which causes cdc_acm to
> >> bind to these devices as well.
> >>
> >>>> I have no clue, whether there are Atmel SAM-BA implementations that do
> >>>> not support the cdc profile.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm not sure, whether the device should be blacklisted in cdc_acm in
> >>>> favor of sam_ba. However, I have the feeling that if sam_ba is actually
> >>>> installed, sam_ba should claim the device even if cdc_acm is already loaded.
> >>>>
> >>>> Last time I tested, the device was working fine with cdc_acm, though.
> >>
> >> I just connected a at91sam9260-ek board and can confirm that the samba
> >> tools do seem to work with the cdc-acm driver, although it does require
> >> a ttyUSBx symlink for the device to be recognised by the user-space tools
> >> (latest v2.10).
> >>
> >> I'm not sure about how to proceed with this. What do you say, Greg?
> > 
> > If the sam-ba driver is not needed, we can just remove it.
> > 
> > The symlink issue should be fixable in the userspace tools to just get
> > it to look for the different port (it should never have hard-coded
> > ttyUSB0 anyway, what if it was on ttyUSB3?).
> 
> It's an UI issue, basically. They show a list of devices and they only
> show the ones matching the pattern ttyUSB*. In addition, you can't enter
> a custom device name. That's why you have to create a symlink, for
> example from ttyACM3 to ttyUSB7.

Wow, what forsight... :)

Have a pointer to the source code for this so I could fix it up?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux