On 01/13/11 12:52, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 05:31:49PM +0100, Johannes Reisinger wrote: >> Yes, the transceiver is ULPI compliant. >> Within the kernel sources I found transceiver support only within the >> 'otg' tree (but maybe I am missing something ...). Does this mean that >> I need transceiver support only for OTG interfaces, but not for pure >> host or device interfaces? > the struct otg_transceiver is mis-named. But yes, currently only gadget > or OTG roles have a SW description of the transceivers. Host-only don't. For the ulpi.c driver, I hope to change this in the future as ULPI does not really depends on the OTG or gadget frameworks. -- Regards, Igor. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
