On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:32:20PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > Le mercredi 12 janvier 2011 ?? 13:23 +0000, Jarek Poplawski a écrit : > > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 02:07:12PM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > ... > > > > > > Hmm... > > > > > > So all net devices in gen_ndis_query_resp() should have a > > > ndo_get_stats() or ndo_get_stats64() method, not allowed to use > > > spin_lock_bh() / spin_unlock_bh() > > > > > > If yes, we should add big fat comments to pn_net_stats()/eth_get_stats() so that nobody > > > tries to revert your patch ;) > > > > I'm not sure I got your point: my patch could be replaced with > > ndo_get_stats64() implementing irq safe locking or by changing > > gen_ndis_query_resp() calling context. It's intended as a fast > > (compatible) fix. > > I was mentioning that we tried in past months to remove useless > ndo_get_stats() methods that were only doing : > > return &net->stats; > > random commit : b27d50a9ff5cf2775b7a4daf5 > > Another possibility would be to use u64_stats_sync.h for these txq > counters. > > (no locking needed to read counters, only a seqcount fetch/retry) > > As a bonus, no overhead on 64bit arches. Well, I'm OK with anything, but this thread gets older and older ;-) Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
