Hi, On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 06:25:11PM +0800, tom.leiming@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c index 07cf394..12b515b 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/musb_core.c @@ -128,12 +128,7 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("platform:" MUSB_DRIVER_NAME); static inline struct musb *dev_to_musb(struct device *dev) { -#ifdef CONFIG_USB_MUSB_HDRC_HCD - /* usbcore insists dev->driver_data is a "struct hcd *" */ - return hcd_to_musb(dev_get_drvdata(dev)); -#else return dev_get_drvdata(dev); -#endif } /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/ @@ -1876,10 +1871,9 @@ allocate_instance(struct device *dev, musb = kzalloc(sizeof *musb, GFP_KERNEL); if (!musb) return NULL; - dev_set_drvdata(dev, musb); #endif - + dev_set_drvdata(dev, musb); musb->mregs = mbase; musb->ctrl_base = mbase; musb->nIrq = -ENODEV;
The patch could be only these two hunks above. The rest is unnecessary, we don't want to force all glue layers to access musb via driver_data, it's just one way (an easy one) to do that. -- balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html