On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 03:40:08PM -0800, rmorell@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 03:09:40PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:42:21PM -0800, rmorell@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 02:35:02PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 01:58:49PM -0800, Robert Morell wrote: > > > > > --- a/include/linux/usb.h > > > > > +++ b/include/linux/usb.h > > > > > @@ -975,6 +975,7 @@ extern int usb_disabled(void); > > > > > #define URB_SETUP_MAP_SINGLE 0x00100000 /* Setup packet DMA mapped */ > > > > > #define URB_SETUP_MAP_LOCAL 0x00200000 /* HCD-local setup packet */ > > > > > #define URB_DMA_SG_COMBINED 0x00400000 /* S-G entries were combined */ > > > > > +#define URB_DRIVER_PRIVATE 0x80000000 /* For driver-private use */ > > > > > > > > Um, what? You are using this for a build check, which seems pointless > > > > as you already modified the code to not need this. > > > > > > > > So it doesn't look like this is needed, right? > > > > > > The intention was to reserve space in the URB flags for > > > implementation-specific use. > > > > Yes, but _which_ driver are you talking about here? You didn't say that > > this was a HCD-only flag, right? > > Sorry, I may not have been clear. I did mean HCD-only flag; its exact > meaning depends on the HCD in question. In the case of tegra-ehci, it > means that a temporary buffer has been allocated that needs freeing > later. > > Would it make more sense if I called it URB_HCD_PRIVATE_MASK? How about naming it what it is being used for? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
