On 06/12/10 09:09, Robert Lukassen wrote:
Yes, providing access to those module parameters was the original goal. I agree that my patch should be reverted and I'll try to come up with a method of accessing these values without violating the information hiding principles too much. I don't like accessing globals.
Do I have to take any action to make sure the original commit [1] gets reverted? [1] 1ab83238740ff1e1773d5c13ecac43c60cf4aec4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
