On Saturday, August 28, 2010, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 28 Aug 2010, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 27. August 2010, 18:43:06 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > For that matter, it might be a good idea to move the last_busy and > > > > autosuspend_delay fields into the dev_pm_info structure, along with the > > > > other runtime PM stuff. Since they are going to be used by both SCSI > > > > and USB, they probably will get used by other subsystems as well. > > > > > > Sounds reasonable. > > > > As far as these fields are concerned, absolutely. > > Do you have any suggestions for the attribute file name? I don't like > the name we're currently using for USB; "autosuspend" doesn't really > express that the value is an idle timeout. Maybe "autosuspend_time" or > "suspend_delay"... suspend_delay would be fine by me. Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
