On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Ming Lei wrote: > > The drawback, of course, is that we would also end up scanning QHs that > > _couldn't_ have made any progress because they weren't reachable from > > any of the frames we're looking at. A different approach that would > > solve this problem is to keep the current scanning code, but store in > > the QH the last frame it was scanned for and skip over QHs that were > > just scanned. > > Scaning each QH only once in scan_periodic is enough, so it is not > difficult to give > the implementation. Sorry, I don't quite get your meaning. It looks like you are simply repeating what I wrote. Is that correct? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
