> User wants to wakeup the Host. If host has enabled wakeup feauture it is fine. > If it is not enabled, user might want to know that. But doing an illegal > operation (According to USB spec) on behalf of super user is wrong. The superuser can do it anyway via PCI hacking, insmod etc > If really there is a need for breaking the rule, another sysfs entry like > "force_remote_wakeup" would be better. That seems a more sensible choice of name - agreed. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
