On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:42:29 +0530 Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 01:16:15PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Why would you want to wake up the Host though remote wakeup feature > > > is not set by the host? Host might have disabled the wakeup > > > capability on purpose. Peripheral must honor it. > > > > Because this is a sysfs interface so user triggered. The superuser > > often should be able to override system behaviour. > > > Can not kernel return -ENOTSUPP to superuser? Why should it ? > Here the system behaviour is not controlled with in the system. Master (Host) > disabled the remote-wakeup capability on the bus. Slave (peripheral) should > honor it. The superuser wishes to override the behaviour. Who is the ultimate dictator of behaviour, the system owner or the kernel ? Alan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
