On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:44 AM, Adam Kropelin > <akropel1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I would propose one of two solutions: (A) Reject the configuration as >> we do today, but only if there are additional configurations available >> to choose from (i.e. bNumConfigurations > 1), or (B) Reject the >> configuration only if there are no additional interfaces in the config >> besides RNDIS. >> >> I lean toward (A). > > Why reject the configuration at all? It is just there will be no rndis > support from the host Linux OS. But it is still a valid USB device. Agreed. But I assume someone put this check in so their second config (probably CDC-ECM) would be chosen on Linux in preference to non-working RNDIS. That's reasonable, I guess, which is why I suggested changing it to only reject the config if there are other configs to choose from. Rejecting the one-and-only config seems silly. --Adam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
