On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 04:14:48PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> The problem this fixes is not a huge bug. In fact, it may not affect
> anybody at all. Consequently this doesn't really need to get into
> 2.6.35; getting into 2.6.35.1 would be good enough.
>
> It probably should go into 2.6.34.stable also. However, this would
> require that the earlier as1364 patch ("USB: don't enable remote wakeup
> by default") go into 2.6.34.stable at the same time. Is that okay?
> Should I resubmit that patch to stable@xxxxxxxxxx?
Yes, please do so.
> For 2.6.33.stable and earlier, the patch won't apply in this form; it
> would need to be back-ported. I think we don't need to worry about
> those kernels.
Ok, .35 and .34, sounds good.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
