On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 03:44:58AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:43:42PM +0200, Daniel Mack wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:34:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > The old code registered the hcd even if there were no transceivers > > > detected, leading to oopses like this if we try to probe a non-existant > > > ULPI: > > > > Hmm. I'm aware that there was a missing bail in this function, but > > actually, I had hardware which didn't properly detect the ULPI chip but > > still worked fine. There has been quite some discussion here about that, > > and eventually I decided to not make this a hard error as it didn't > > really harm. > > Hmm, so, do you think this patch is stable-material after all? Hard to say. It might break existing board support, which would be a regression. OTOH, it fixes an Oops. Don't know really ... Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
