On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Mike Rapoport <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Eric Miao wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/ohci.h | 3 + >>> arch/arm/mach-pxa/include/mach/regs-u2d.h | 2 + >>> drivers/usb/host/ohci-pxa27x.c | 183 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> My feeling is on pxa310, the OTG/ULPI is actually closer to the UDC, so >> generally, I'd really like to see minimum change to ohci. > > There are certain registers set up that should be done in order to enable > the pxa310 otg port in the host mode. I agree that most of them should be > done in the UDC driver, but since there's no UDC driver at all for pxa310, Wow, that's a big problem. > the most logical place for those register set ups would be pxa ohci glue > driver. > So, is there a simple way to setup the ULPI for the host within mach-pxa/*? We need really really simple code for that, so it has minimum impact when we move that part into pxa310-udc.c? I still want ohci-pxa27x to remain minimum impacted. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
