--- On Fri, 5/28/10, Michał Nazarewicz <m.nazarewicz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 1. The ID 255 will never be assigned. Is it intended > or a bug? ISTR intentional ... isn't 255 reserved to indicate "no valid string ID"? (Either in the USB spec or in Linux.) I'd have to check the spec to verify. > 2. 'next_string_id' name is not really appropriate since it does not > store an ID of a *next* string I don't follow. It's certainly the next ID returned by that function... - Dave. > but *last* > sting. It should rather > read 'last_string_id', shouldn't it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
