On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 08:16:26AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > It applied, thanks, I've pushed the change out now. Thanks for applying it! Did it fuzz a little? The first hunk appears to have been moved to between two class code definitions instead of at the end of the other descriptor type definitions. I'd be pedantic enough to move it up to line 69 (from line 83), but it certainly doesn't affect correctness. Where does libusb development live these days? Really these definitions should go in there instead of in lsusb.c. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
