On 10 April 2010 13:49, Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 07:19:22PM +0100, Pedro Ribeiro wrote: >> On 9 April 2010 19:09, Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:01:27PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: >> >> I don't see anything suspicious. The transfer_buffer addresses repeat >> >> every 32 URBs, and the DMA addresses cycle almost entirely uniformly >> >> from 0x20000000 to 0x23ffffff in units of 0x2000 (there are a few gaps >> >> where the interval is a little bigger). >> > >> > The DMA pointers do indeed look sane. I wanted to take a deeper look at >> > this and set up a 64bit system today. However, I fail to see the problem >> > here. Pedro, how much RAM does your machine have installed? >> > >> > Daniel >> > >> > >> >> It has 4 GB. > > Upgraded my machine now to 4GB, but I still can't reproduce this bug. > Pedro, can you send your config, please? > > Daniel > Here it is. It is configured for realtime and TuxOnIce patches. However, the bug still occurs without these kernel patches. Pedro
Attachment:
.config_2.6.33-rt-ToI
Description: Binary data
