Hi,
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 11:58:45AM +0100, ext Gadiyar, Anand wrote:
Felipe Balbi wrote:
From now on, please help us do a better job and only send _fixes_ during
the -rc cycle. I'll be accepting new code by -rc6 only. If you send new
code before that, I'll comment on the patch and delete it from my inbox.
Why can't we follow Greg's model and keep two queues - one with fixes
for the current cycle, and one with features for the merge window?
That way, we give people the ability to test the new features too.
Also, if it's okay with you and Greg, I would prefer that there were
only one USB queue - Greg can take the patches and add it to his series.
That way, we don't need to track multiple trees. It shouldn't be much
work now, as most of the MUSB code is in - so we can treat MUSB the same
way the rest of the USB code is treated.
If Greg is ok with it. I'm ok too. Although he would need us to filter
out what doesn't need to be applied. And that's actually what I've been
doing for him. Basically preparing the patches and (mostly recently)
splitting into fixes and new features.
--
balbi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
