On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:19:58PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 02:33:08PM -0700, Sarah Sharp wrote: > > Yes, I did par down the duplicate/redundant messages, but I still want > > to see very detailed messages when I think there's a hardware problem. > > > > What if I removed the debug config option for xHCI, allowed people to > > use dynamic debugging to enable debugging for specific xHCI files, but > > also allowed them to set the log level through a debugfs file? That way > > people could still control the variety of messages that they see, but > > they can also change the level of debugging dynamically. > > Sure, that might work, but I'd recommend tracing for the most part, > that's what it is there for :) Ok, I'll look into adding trace events. Sarah Sharp -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
