On Sat, 2010-03-06 at 19:36 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 04:17:23PM +0530, James Bottomley wrote: > > On a fault in of exec data, we first try to get the page out of the page > > cache. If it's not present, we put the faulting process to sleep and > > fetch it in from storage. When we do the read, on the PIO path, the > > kernel alias for the page becomes dirty. Some time later, we place the > > page into the user space (updating the pte entry that caused a fault). > > At this point, we'll call both flush_icache_page() and > > update_mmu_cache() ... this is where the I/D resolution should be done. > > No - this is where things get extremely icky. > > The problem at this point occurs on SMP architectures. As soon as you > update the PTE entry, it is visible to other threads of the application. > If you do I-cache handling after updating the PTE, then there is a window > where another CPU can execute the page: > > CPU0 CPU1 > speculatively prefetches from page N via kernel > mapping, loads garbage into I-cache > attempts to execute P > page fault > page N allocated > set_pte_at > executes P > *splat* > flush I-cache You have two choices - either invalidate the I-cache before the user pte becomes visible or set the page as not-executable in set_pte_at() and later mark it as executable in update_mmu_cache (via set_pte_ext). We currently invalidate the whole I-cache for historical reasons but we could actually only invalidate a single page. Since even on latest ARM CPUs, the I-cache is a real VIPT (i.e. can have aliases), we would need to invalidate on the user mapping (or create a temporary one). The latter approach of clearing the X bit in set_pte_at may actually help with this scenario (I haven't done any tests though). -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
