On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 23:29 +0000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:05 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > The viable solutions so far: > > > > 1. Implement a PIO mapping API similar to the DMA API which takes > > care of the D-cache flushing. This means that PIO drivers would > > need to be modified to use an API like pio_kmap()/pio_kunmap() > > before writing to a page cache page. > > 2. Invert the meaning of PG_arch_1 to denote a clean page. This > > means that by default newly allocated page cache pages are > > considered dirty and even if there isn't a call to > > flush_dcache_page(), update_mmu_cache() would flush the D-cache. > > This is the PowerPC approach. [...] > > Option 2 above looks pretty appealing to me since it can be done in the > > ARM code exclusively. I've done some tests and it indeed solves the > > cache coherency with a rootfs on a USB stick. As Russell suggested, it > > can be optimised to mark a page as clean when the DMA API is involved to > > avoid duplicate flushing. > > That wouldn't solve the need for invalidating the I-cache... Unless we > use another bit. Indeed. We currently always invalidate the I-cache when the page is mapped. With PG_arch_2, we could optimise this but I'm not sure it is worth since I think we only get an update_mmu_cache() call for a page (unless it is unmapped and re-mapped again). -- Catalin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html