Am Mittwoch, 27. Januar 2010 19:16:07 schrieben Sie: > > > That's basically right. A driver doesn't have to kill its own URBs, > > > but it is considered good form to do so. > > > > Ehm, there's the small matter of disconnect by sysfs or usbfs. > > Or module unload. > > The reason for calling the disconnect routine doesn't matter; the core > first disables the interface's endpoints, meaning that pending URBs > will fail with -ESHUTDOWN and new submissions will fail with -ENOENT. > However URBs for endpoint 0 are unaffected -- the driver has to handle > them on its own. And there's the point of drivers using usb_claim_interface(). Basically you should just kill them all. Regards Oliver -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
