On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 08:57:57PM +0300, Fedor Pchelkin wrote:
> usbmisc is an optional device property so it is totally valid for the
> corresponding data->usbmisc_data to have a NULL value.
>
> Check that before dereferencing the pointer.
>
> Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Svace static
> analysis tool.
I have not seen any words "linuxtesting.org" in linux source tree. I am
not sure if it reproducable for other people. So this sense have not
provide much useful information.
Fixes itself is good.
Frank
>
> Fixes: 74adad500346 ("usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: decrement device's refcount in .remove() and in the error path of .probe()")
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> index 1a7fc638213e..619779eef333 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> @@ -534,7 +534,8 @@ static int ci_hdrc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> cpu_latency_qos_remove_request(&data->pm_qos_req);
> data->ci_pdev = NULL;
> err_put:
> - put_device(data->usbmisc_data->dev);
> + if (data->usbmisc_data)
> + put_device(data->usbmisc_data->dev);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -559,7 +560,8 @@ static void ci_hdrc_imx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (data->hsic_pad_regulator)
> regulator_disable(data->hsic_pad_regulator);
> }
> - put_device(data->usbmisc_data->dev);
> + if (data->usbmisc_data)
> + put_device(data->usbmisc_data->dev);
> }
>
> static void ci_hdrc_imx_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
> --
> 2.48.1
>
