On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:41:39 +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> On 10.2.2025 9.42, Michal Pecio wrote:
> > + if (ring_xrun_event) {
> > + /*
> > + * If we are here, we are on xHCI 1.0 host with no idea how
> > + * many TDs were missed and where the xrun occurred. Don't
> > + * skip more TDs, they may have been queued after the xrun.
> > + */
> > + xhci_dbg(xhci, "Skipped one TD for slot %u ep %u",
> > + slot_id, ep_index);
> > + break;
>
> This would be the same as return 0; right?
>
> Whole series looks good, I'll add it
I hope you haven't sent it out yet because I found two minor issues.
Firstly,
[PATCH 3/5] usb: xhci: Fix isochronous Ring Underrun/Overrun event handling
increases the number of xrun events that we handle but doesn't suppress
the "Event TRB for slot %u ep %u with no TDs queued\n" warning, so the
warning started to show up sometimes for no good reason. The fix is to
add ring_xrun_event to the list of exception for this warning.
Secondly,
[PATCH 5/5] usb: xhci: Skip only one TD on Ring Underrun/Overrun
can be improved to clear the skip flag if skipped TD was the only one.
This eliminates any confusion and risk of skipping bugs in the future.
The change is a matter of moving that code to a different branch.
I also changed 'break' to 'return 0' because it gets hard to follow at
this level of indentation.
I'll send a v2 of those two patches. Sorry for any inconvenience.
Michal
