On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 17:41:39 +0200, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> > + if (ring_xrun_event) {
> > + /*
> > + * If we are here, we are on xHCI 1.0 host with no idea how
> > + * many TDs were missed and where the xrun occurred. Don't
> > + * skip more TDs, they may have been queued after the xrun.
> > + */
> > + xhci_dbg(xhci, "Skipped one TD for slot %u ep %u",
> > + slot_id, ep_index);
> > + break;
>
> This would be the same as return 0; right?
Currently, yes. I know it looks silly, but I thought it would be more
future proof than hardcoding 'return 0' into the loop. The point it to
simply stop iteration, what happens next is none of the loop's business.
I hope gcc is clever enough to do the right thing here.
Regards,
Michal
