On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:03:06 +0100 Antonio Ospite <ospite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:23:55 +0100 > Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Antonio Ospite <ospite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > With your latest patch on top of 2.6.32 I get the "possible recursive > > > locking" message at the *first* cable unplug/plug cycle, I am appending > > > it here, the log is partial because I dumped it from RAM and something > > > was lost. > > > > Thanks. > > Now, lets have another try. This patch is a bit saner, and though I got the > > "locking detected" you noticed without it, I didn't manage to get it with this > > patch applied. > > > > As your test platform is far better than mine, would you mind a bit of testing > > ... again. This patch applies on top of v2.6.32. > > > > Just FYI our repository has been updated to 2.6.33-rc2 and I haven't > been able to reproduce the message here yet _without_ the patch. > I'll go back to 2.6.32 and test again with and without this patch in > next days, and report promptly. > Hi Robert, Only today I've found some time to test the patch in a 2.6.32 setup, I am not able to reproduce the issue with your latest patch _applied_, while it it still there with unpatched code, so I'd say it is an improvement. Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Attachment:
pgpdfCvDamywt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
