On Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:23:55 +0100 Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Antonio Ospite <ospite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > With your latest patch on top of 2.6.32 I get the "possible recursive > > locking" message at the *first* cable unplug/plug cycle, I am appending > > it here, the log is partial because I dumped it from RAM and something > > was lost. > > Thanks. > Now, lets have another try. This patch is a bit saner, and though I got the > "locking detected" you noticed without it, I didn't manage to get it with this > patch applied. > > As your test platform is far better than mine, would you mind a bit of testing > ... again. This patch applies on top of v2.6.32. > Just FYI our repository has been updated to 2.6.33-rc2 and I haven't been able to reproduce the message here yet _without_ the patch. I'll go back to 2.6.32 and test again with and without this patch in next days, and report promptly. > Cheers. > > -- > Robert > Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it PGP public key ID: 0x4553B001 A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Attachment:
pgpq6qRudIZz9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
