Re: devio.c in 2.6.32.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:32:13PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > usbfs_snoop was useful, and worked, even though it may have duplicated
> > a feature elsewhere.  Now, it is only half as useful.  I consider that
> > broken, and would like to restore it, at least as far as "actual_length"
> > functionality.  I agree that it was too verbose before.
> 
> So now it's not worth it at all?  What specifically would you want back?
> Patches welcome (either to put back what you need or to just delete it
> entirely.)

As I said in my original email, I'm working on a patch to put the data
logging back in.  I'm just not as quick as you USB experts are. :-)

I'm arguing that the data logging should stay, or usbfs_snoop should
go completely.  But leaving it crippled doesn't seem like a good option
to me.

- Chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux