On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:06:04PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Mark Brown wrote: > > This would also mean that other people could run and re-run the scripts > > during development much more easily which would help improve the > > coverage of new code. > On the other hand, one has to take into account the fact that at least in > my case, the patches that are submitted are the ones that I have carefully > checked for correctness. Having a make target in the kernel might give > some suggestion of quality that is perhaps not appropriate? This is a general problem with any tool that generates warnings - we already have to educate people about how to use the GCC and sparse warnings appropriately, I can't see that these warnings would be any different. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
