On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:05:21AM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: > On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > It seems to me that the scripts are kernel specific so why don't we > > put those useful scripts _within_ the kernel source tree and introduce > > a "make coccinelle-check" target? > Indeed, perhaps a solution that would satisfy everyone would be to make a > place for scripts, perhaps with subdirectories for various tools, and then > when one submits a patch for tool X, one could then submit the script at > the same time (if it wasn't there already) and just refer to the script > that was used. That way, if someone wants to know more about how the > change was made, they could look up the information, and if one does not, > then one would not be bother by having to scroll down to see the actual > patch. This would also mean that other people could run and re-run the scripts during development much more easily which would help improve the coverage of new code. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
