On 08.01.25 14:28, Neronin, Niklas wrote:
On 08/01/2025 13.17, Oliver Neukum wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether this patch should go
into the stable tree. As far as I can see the issue
it fixes is old. What do you think?
Regards
Oliver
Hi Oliver,
My patch does not change any functionality. The extra loop was never
executed, and the function's return value remains unchanged [1].
I addressed this issue primarily for the benefit of developers.
While the function is straightforward, the extra loop is not.
Identifying its redundancy wastes time.
Hi,
thank you. I admit, I overlooked the 'if' statement.
Thank you
Oliver
