Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > BTW Personally I see nothing wrong with too verbose commit changelogs, > too sparse changelogs are a much bigger annoyance.. Verbosity on its own does not ensure that the important bits happen to be in the log though. If somebody is deliberately verbose, please structure the message so that the important bits can still be quickly spotted. (Don't waste people's time.) However, a submission which can be adequately changelogged by one or two lines, coupled with something like 30 lines of "and here is the script that generated it for me" is just plain strange. How is that fitting for the final immutable history? It's just noise. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- ---= -==-= http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
