On Fri, 6 Sep 2024 10:28:11 -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 10:11:03PM +0800, Edward Adam Davis wrote: > > The syzbot reported a kernel-usb-infoleak in usbtmc_write. > > > > The expression "aligned = (transfersize + (USBTMC_HEADER_SIZE + 3)) & ~3;" > > in usbtmcw_write() follows the following pattern: > > > > aligned = (1 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 16 // 3 bytes have not been initialized > > aligned = (2 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 16 // 2 bytes have not been initialized > > aligned = (3 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 16 // 1 byte has not been initialized > > aligned = (4 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 16 // All bytes have been initialized > > aligned = (5 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 20 // 3 bytes have not been initialized > > aligned = (6 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 20 // 2 bytes have not been initialized > > aligned = (7 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 20 // 1 byte has not been initialized > > aligned = (8 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 20 // All bytes have been initialized > > aligned = (9 + 12 + 3) & ~3 = 24 > > ... > > What is the purpose of aligned? Why doesn't the driver simply use > USBTMC_HEADER_SIZE + transfersize instead of rounding it up to a > multiple of 4? I just found out that the logic of aligned calculation is like this. As for why it is calculated like this, perhaps Guido Kiener can provide a clearer explanation. It was introduced by commit 4d5e18d9ed93 ("usb: usbtmc: Optimize usbtmc_write"). > > > Note: #define USBTMC_HEADER_SIZE 12 > > > > This results in the buffer[USBTMC_SEAD_SIZE+transfersize] and its > > subsequent memory not being initialized. > > > > The condition aligned < buflen is used to avoid out of bounds access to > > the buffer[USBTMC_HEADER_SIZE + transfersize] when "transfersize = > > buflen - USBTMC_HEADER_SIZE". > > > > Fixes: 4ddc645f40e9 ("usb: usbtmc: Add ioctl for vendor specific write") > > Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+9d34f80f841e948c3fdb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9d34f80f841e948c3fdb > > Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@xxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c > > index 6bd9fe565385..faf8c5508997 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/class/usbtmc.c > > @@ -1591,6 +1591,10 @@ static ssize_t usbtmc_write(struct file *filp, const char __user *buf, > > goto exit; > > } > > > > + if (aligned < buflen && (transfersize % 4)) > > Shouldn't this be > > if (USBTMC_HEADER_SIZE + transfersize < aligned) Logically, it seems possible to write it this way. > > ? > > Alan Stern > > > + memset(&buffer[USBTMC_HEADER_SIZE + transfersize], 0, > > + aligned - USBTMC_HEADER_SIZE - transfersize); > > + > > dev_dbg(&data->intf->dev, "%s(size:%u align:%u)\n", __func__, > > (unsigned int)transfersize, (unsigned int)aligned); BR, Edward