On Sun, 20 Dec 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Hi, > > Alan, I took your idea of just suspending the bus. It seems to me > that we cannot do that unconditionally, as for some drivers like > btusb simply continuing transmission is wrong. But with a flag it > is a fascinating idea, because we cannot resume faster than by > doing nothing. > So this is the first draft. Comments? You must have misunderstood my idea. I never meant to skip notifying drivers about suspends. The point was to avoid actually suspending and resuming the devices. Did you read the test patch? I don't see any benefit to your patch. Instead of having a "supports_transparent_suspend" flag, why not just have suspend and resume routines that do nothing? Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
