> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-usb-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-usb- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Heikki Krogerus > Sent: Friday, December 18, 2009 6:01 PM > To: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx; dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ext- > heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxx > Subject: [RFC/PATCH 0/5] musb: host: mode1 support > > I have only tested these with the Inventra DMA engine. > > Felipe Balbi (1): > usb: musb: host: remove dma support > > Heikki Krogerus (5): > usb: musb: host: transfer queue for every endpoint > usb: musb: host: add start_dma() stop_dma() > usb: musb: host: enable DMA for RX > usb: musb: host: enable DMA for TX Can't we support Mode-1 with existing implementation? Do we have any Other advantage of using the new DMA implementation? As you said it's tested only against Inventra DMA so we really need time to regress test non-Inventra DMAs. -Ajay > > musb_core.c | 35 + > musb_core.h | 5 > musb_dma.h | 6 > musb_host.c | 1238 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- > ----- > musb_host.h | 59 +- > 5 files changed, 508 insertions(+), 835 deletions(-) > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
