On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 09:30:34AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 09:23:43AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 02:57:16PM +0900, Daehwan Jung wrote: > > > [Synopsys]- The host controller was design to support ERST setting > > > during the RUN state. But since there is a limitation in controller > > > in supporting separate ERSTBA_HI and ERSTBA_LO programming, > > > It is supported when the ERSTBA is programmed in 64bit, > > > or in 32 bit mode ERSTBA_HI before ERSTBA_LO > > > > > > [Synopsys]- The internal initialization of event ring fetches > > > the "Event Ring Segment Table Entry" based on the indication of > > > ERSTBA_LO written. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Daehwan Jung <dh10.jung@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c | 5 ++++- > > > drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 2 ++ > > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c > > > index 3100219..ef768e6 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-mem.c > > > @@ -2325,7 +2325,10 @@ xhci_add_interrupter(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct xhci_interrupter *ir, > > > erst_base = xhci_read_64(xhci, &ir->ir_set->erst_base); > > > erst_base &= ERST_BASE_RSVDP; > > > erst_base |= ir->erst.erst_dma_addr & ~ERST_BASE_RSVDP; > > > - xhci_write_64(xhci, erst_base, &ir->ir_set->erst_base); > > > + if (xhci->quirks & XHCI_WRITE_64_HI_LO) > > > + hi_lo_writeq(erst_base, &ir->ir_set->erst_base); > > > + else > > > + xhci_write_64(xhci, erst_base, &ir->ir_set->erst_base); > > > > > > /* Set the event ring dequeue address of this interrupter */ > > > xhci_set_hc_event_deq(xhci, ir); > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h > > > index 3041515..8664dd1 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h > > > +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h > > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ > > > #include <linux/kernel.h> > > > #include <linux/usb/hcd.h> > > > #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h> > > > +#include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-hi-lo.h> > > Why not put this in the .c file? I add it following similar header file. #include <linux/io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi.h> Do you think it should be put in .c file because .c file only uses it? If so, I will modify it in the next submission. > > > > /* Code sharing between pci-quirks and xhci hcd */ > > > #include "xhci-ext-caps.h" > > > @@ -1627,6 +1628,7 @@ struct xhci_hcd { > > > #define XHCI_RESET_TO_DEFAULT BIT_ULL(44) > > > #define XHCI_ZHAOXIN_TRB_FETCH BIT_ULL(45) > > > #define XHCI_ZHAOXIN_HOST BIT_ULL(46) > > > +#define XHCI_WRITE_64_HI_LO BIT_ULL(47) > > Note, you define this, and check it, but it is never set, so this patch > is useless on its own and so we can not accept it as-is at all. > > How was this tested? I got it. I will add other patches and send the patchset. > > thanks, > > greg k-h >