RE: [PATCH 1/4] musb: get rid of unneeded musb->config->dyn_fifo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-omap-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-omap-
> owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gupta, Ajay Kumar
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 8:45 PM
> To: felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] musb: get rid of unneeded musb->config->dyn_fifo
> 
> 
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:31:46PM +0100, ext Ajay Kumar Gupta wrote:
> >>diff --git a/include/linux/usb/musb.h b/include/linux/usb/musb.h
> >>index d437556..c5f006e 100644
> >>--- a/include/linux/usb/musb.h
> >>+++ b/include/linux/usb/musb.h
> >>@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ struct musb_hdrc_eps_bits {
> >> struct musb_hdrc_config {
> >>      /* MUSB configuration-specific details */
> >>      unsigned        multipoint:1;   /* multipoint device */
> >>-     unsigned        dyn_fifo:1;     /* supports dynamic fifo sizing */
> >>      unsigned        soft_con:1;     /* soft connect required */
> >>      unsigned        utm_16:1;       /* utm data witdh is 16 bits */
> >>      unsigned        big_endian:1;   /* true if CPU uses big-endian */
> >
> >same problem as the other patch I sent:
> >
> >$ git grep -w dyn_fifo arch/
> >arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb.c:    .dyn_fifo       = true,
> >arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c: .dyn_fifo       = 1,
> >arch/blackfin/mach-bf527/boards/cm_bf527.c:     .dyn_fifo       = 0,
> >arch/blackfin/mach-bf527/boards/ezbrd.c:        .dyn_fifo       = 0,
> >arch/blackfin/mach-bf527/boards/ezkit.c:        .dyn_fifo       = 0,
> >arch/blackfin/mach-bf548/boards/cm_bf548.c:     .dyn_fifo       = 0,
> >arch/blackfin/mach-bf548/boards/ezkit.c:        .dyn_fifo       = 0,
> >
> >we have to agree who will carry the arch changes.
> 
> >what we can do is mark that field as deprecated and give one major
> >release for people to remove that from their boards, then we send a
> >patch finally removing it.
> 
> Even with one major release window someone has to submit patch removing
> them
> from arch/ files. So I think it's better to remove them now itself. we can
> seperately
> submit patches to respective maintainers. Or best is if Greg can accept
> those changes
> which are mostly trivial.

Felipe,

Any update on this ? Shall I send the series again with __deprecated ? or
If you can just add it on your own?

Thanks,
Ajay

> 
> -Ajay--
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux