>Hi,
>
>On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 02:31:46PM +0100, ext Ajay Kumar Gupta wrote:
>>diff --git a/include/linux/usb/musb.h b/include/linux/usb/musb.h
>>index d437556..c5f006e 100644
>>--- a/include/linux/usb/musb.h
>>+++ b/include/linux/usb/musb.h
>>@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ struct musb_hdrc_eps_bits {
>> struct musb_hdrc_config {
>> /* MUSB configuration-specific details */
>> unsigned multipoint:1; /* multipoint device */
>>- unsigned dyn_fifo:1; /* supports dynamic fifo sizing */
>> unsigned soft_con:1; /* soft connect required */
>> unsigned utm_16:1; /* utm data witdh is 16 bits */
>> unsigned big_endian:1; /* true if CPU uses big-endian */
>
>same problem as the other patch I sent:
>
>$ git grep -w dyn_fifo arch/
>arch/arm/mach-davinci/usb.c: .dyn_fifo = true,
>arch/arm/mach-omap2/usb-musb.c: .dyn_fifo = 1,
>arch/blackfin/mach-bf527/boards/cm_bf527.c: .dyn_fifo = 0,
>arch/blackfin/mach-bf527/boards/ezbrd.c: .dyn_fifo = 0,
>arch/blackfin/mach-bf527/boards/ezkit.c: .dyn_fifo = 0,
>arch/blackfin/mach-bf548/boards/cm_bf548.c: .dyn_fifo = 0,
>arch/blackfin/mach-bf548/boards/ezkit.c: .dyn_fifo = 0,
>
>we have to agree who will carry the arch changes.
>what we can do is mark that field as deprecated and give one major
>release for people to remove that from their boards, then we send a
>patch finally removing it.
Even with one major release window someone has to submit patch removing them
from arch/ files. So I think it's better to remove them now itself. we can seperately
submit patches to respective maintainers. Or best is if Greg can accept those changes
which are mostly trivial.
-Ajay--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
