On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 03:15:16PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > > ucsi_register_altmode checks IS_ERR on returned pointer and treats > > NULL as valid. This results in a null deref when > > trace_ucsi_register_altmode is called. > > I find that the change description can be improved further. > Is another imperative wording desirable? > > Can it be nicer to use the term “dereference” for the final commit message? Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
