On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 04:40:05PM +0100, Aleksandr Nogikh wrote: > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 8:18 PM Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 05:52:50PM +0100, Aleksandr Nogikh wrote: > > > Hi Alan, > > > > > > Please try it once more with the full commit hash. > > > > Thanks for the advice. Are you a good person to complain to about the > > difference between what syzbot provides and what it will accept? This > > bug report states > > > > HEAD commit: f2e367d6ad3b Merge tag 'for-6.8/dm-fix-3' of git://git.ker.. > > git tree: upstream > > > > But if I specify "upstream" as the git tree on a syz test request, it > > doesn't accept it. Now you're suggesting that if I put f2e367d6ad3b as > > the commit ID, it won't accept it. > > > > There's probably already a bugfix request for this, but I'd like to push > > on it some more. Syzbot's output should be acceptable as its input! > > That all totally makes sense. Thanks for highlighting the problems! > > For accepting "upstream" (and alike) as input, there was already a github issue: > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/issues/2265 > That syzbot is not able to fetch commits by their short hashes was > only discovered yesterday. > > I've just sent PRs with fixes for both issues. > > If there's anything else that can make syzbot reports better, please > let me know :) That's great news! Thanks a lot. How will we know when the fixes have been accepted and we can use them? Alan Stern
