On Mon, 15 Jan 2024 at 12:00, Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 13.01.2024 21:55, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > Define VBUS regulator and the Type-C handling block as present on the
> > Quacomm PMI632 PMIC.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi632.dtsi | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi632.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi632.dtsi
> > index 4eb79e0ce40a..d6832f0b7b80 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi632.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/pmi632.dtsi
> > @@ -45,6 +45,36 @@ pmic@2 {
> > #address-cells = <1>;
> > #size-cells = <0>;
> >
> > + pmi632_vbus: usb-vbus-regulator@1100 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,pmi632-vbus-reg", "qcom,pm8150b-vbus-reg";
> > + reg = <0x1100>;
> > + status = "disabled";
> > + };
> > +
> > + pmi632_typec: typec@1500 {
> > + compatible = "qcom,pmi632-typec";
> > + reg = <0x1500>;
> > + interrupts = <0x2 0x15 0x00 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <0x2 0x15 0x01 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> > + <0x2 0x15 0x02 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <0x2 0x15 0x03 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> > + <0x2 0x15 0x04 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <0x2 0x15 0x05 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> > + <0x2 0x15 0x06 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> > + <0x2 0x15 0x07 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
> This differs from the downstream irq types:
>
> <0x2 0x15 0x0 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> <0x2 0x15 0x1 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> <0x2 0x15 0x2 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> <0x2 0x15 0x3 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> <0x2 0x15 0x4 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH>,
> <0x2 0x15 0x5 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> <0x2 0x15 0x6 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
> <0x2 0x15 0x7 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
I must admit, I copied the IRQs from the pm8150b rather than from the
vendor kernel.
Bryan, any idea which set of flags is more correct?
> Is it intended?
>
> Thanks a lot for working on this!
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
