On 15.09.23 14:57, Heikki Krogerus wrote: > On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 02:23:48PM +0200, Javier Carrasco wrote: >> The TPS6598x PD controller provides an active-high hardware reset input >> that reinitializes all device settings. If it is not grounded by >> design, the driver must be able to de-assert it in order to initialize >> the device. >> >> The PD controller is not ready for registration right after the reset >> de-assertion and a delay must be introduced in that case. According to >> TI, the delay can reach up to 1000 ms [1], which is in line with the >> experimental results obtained with a TPS65987D. >> >> Add a GPIO descriptor for the reset signal and basic reset management >> for initialization and suspend/resume. >> >> [1] https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/ >> f/power-management-forum/1269856/tps65987d-tps65987d-reset-de-assert- >> to-normal-operation/4809389#4809389 >> >> Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c >> index 37b56ce75f39..3068ef300073 100644 >> --- a/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c >> +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c >> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ >> >> #include <linux/i2c.h> >> #include <linux/acpi.h> >> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h> >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/of.h> >> #include <linux/power_supply.h> >> @@ -43,6 +44,9 @@ >> /* TPS_REG_SYSTEM_CONF bits */ >> #define TPS_SYSCONF_PORTINFO(c) ((c) & 7) >> >> +/* reset de-assertion to ready for operation */ >> +#define SETUP_MS 1000 >> + >> enum { >> TPS_PORTINFO_SINK, >> TPS_PORTINFO_SINK_ACCESSORY, >> @@ -86,6 +90,7 @@ struct tps6598x { >> struct mutex lock; /* device lock */ >> u8 i2c_protocol:1; >> >> + struct gpio_desc *reset; >> struct typec_port *port; >> struct typec_partner *partner; >> struct usb_pd_identity partner_identity; >> @@ -717,6 +722,13 @@ static int tps6598x_probe(struct i2c_client *client) >> mutex_init(&tps->lock); >> tps->dev = &client->dev; >> >> + tps->reset = devm_gpiod_get_optional(tps->dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW); >> + if (IS_ERR(tps->reset)) >> + return dev_err_probe(tps->dev, PTR_ERR(tps->reset), >> + "failed to get reset GPIO\n"); >> + if (tps->reset) >> + msleep(SETUP_MS); >> + >> tps->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tps6598x_regmap_config); >> if (IS_ERR(tps->regmap)) >> return PTR_ERR(tps->regmap); >> @@ -892,6 +904,9 @@ static void tps6598x_remove(struct i2c_client *client) >> tps6598x_disconnect(tps, 0); >> typec_unregister_port(tps->port); >> usb_role_switch_put(tps->role_sw); >> + >> + if (tps->reset) >> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tps->reset, 1); > > Do you need that "if (tps->reset)" in this case? That function is NULL safe, > right? > The function makes use of the VALIDATE_DESC_VOID macro to make it NULL safe, but this macro also calls pr_warn if the descriptor is NULL and I do not want to add warnings for an optional property that did not exist before because it could be confusing. But if that is the desired behavior, I will remove the checks. >> } >> >> static int __maybe_unused tps6598x_suspend(struct device *dev) >> @@ -902,6 +917,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused tps6598x_suspend(struct device *dev) >> if (tps->wakeup) { >> disable_irq(client->irq); >> enable_irq_wake(client->irq); >> + } else if (tps->reset) { >> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tps->reset, 1); >> } >> >> if (!client->irq) >> @@ -918,6 +935,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused tps6598x_resume(struct device *dev) >> if (tps->wakeup) { >> disable_irq_wake(client->irq); >> enable_irq(client->irq); >> + } else if (tps->reset) { >> + gpiod_set_value_cansleep(tps->reset, 0); >> + msleep(SETUP_MS); >> } >> >> if (!client->irq) >> >> -- >> 2.39.2 > > thanks, > Thanks and best regards, Javier Carrasco
