Hi Arnd, Arnd Bergmann (arnd@xxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> I'll leave it up to you, if you want to merge Martin's patches or > >> a replacement for the soc-imx driver through the imx tree for 6.5, > >> I'll drop my patch from this series, otherwise I'll keep it for now > >> and we can still do it better at later point. > > I suggest we merge my patches for imx25 first and then clean up all the > > older imx families to use the common functions. > > I've just rebased the patches against today's linux-next. My understanding > > is that they have to go through the clk tree. > This never happened, right? I see that mx25_revision() is still in the > tree without any users, so I can't easily turn on the warning by default > yet. Should I just go ahead and remove it for 5.6, or do you expect to > have your patch ready in time for the merge window? sorry for delaying your series. So far, there's been no response to my patches from the clk maintainers. Let me resend the patches one final time. If we don't hear anything back within a week or so, feel free to remove mx25_revision (and probably all of arch/arm/mach-imx/cpu-imx25.c) for the 6.6 merge window. Thanks, Martin
