On 20.07.23 14:01, Johan Hovold wrote:
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 01:44:06PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
+ * These tables are NOT in order of device id by intention
+ *
+ * Keep them and add new entries sorted by
+ *
+ * 1. Alphabetical order of the vendor name
+ * 2. Alphabetical order of the product name
+ *
+ */
No, this is not correct. The tables are sorted alphabetically based on
the symbol names, but the entries in each table is sorted by VID/PID as
usual.
OK, I stand corrected. You do understand that this ordering is
extremely peculiar? I am sorry, but deducing that from the example,
which the current order is, will just not work. Nobody gets that
without a clear and present explanation.
This just needs a comment in the text.
Regards
Oliver
