keeping a list ordered alphabetically instead
nummerically be vendor/product ID is unusual.
This is so odd that examples do not help.
It needs to be clearly stated with strong words.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@xxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial-simple.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial-simple.c b/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial-simple.c
index 24b8772a345e..954b3be7403d 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/serial/usb-serial-simple.c
@@ -33,6 +33,16 @@ static struct usb_serial_driver vendor##_device = { \
#define DEVICE(vendor, IDS) DEVICE_N(vendor, IDS, 1)
+/*
+ * These tables are NOT in order of device id by intention
+ *
+ * Keep them and add new entries sorted by
+ *
+ * 1. Alphabetical order of the vendor name
+ * 2. Alphabetical order of the product name
+ *
+ */
+
/* Medtronic CareLink USB driver */
#define CARELINK_IDS() \
{ USB_DEVICE(0x0a21, 0x8001) } /* MMT-7305WW */
--
2.41.0
