On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:50:31AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:29:18AM +0200, Jonas Blixt wrote: > > If a hub is disconnected that has device(s) that's attached to the usbip layer > > the disconnect function might fail because it tries to release the port > > on an already disconnected hub. > > > > Fixes: 6080cd0e9239 ("staging: usbip: claim ports used by shared devices") > > Signed-off-by: Jonas Blixt <jonas.blixt@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c | 8 ++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c b/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c > > index 2305d425e6c9..257861787cdf 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/usbip/stub_dev.c > > @@ -427,8 +427,12 @@ static void stub_disconnect(struct usb_device *udev) > > /* release port */ > > rc = usb_hub_release_port(udev->parent, udev->portnum, > > (struct usb_dev_state *) udev); > > - if (rc) { > > - dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "unable to release port\n"); > > + /* > > + * NOTE: If a HUB disconnect triggered disconnect of the down stream > > + * device usb_hub_release_port will return -ENODEV. > > How about adding, "so we can safely ignore that error here." > > thanks, > > greg k-h Yes, I'll update the comment and prepare a V2 patch. Jonas