Re: [PATCH] HID: bug in pidff_reset()?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Roel Kluin wrote:

> Hi!
> 
> vi drivers/hid/usbhid/hid-pidff.c +1183
> and note at the bottom of function pidff_reset(), that
> local variable sim_effects does not change in the loop,
> is there an assignment in the bottom missing?
> 
>         if (pidff->pool[PID_SIMULTANEOUS_MAX].value) {
>                 int sim_effects = pidff->pool[PID_SIMULTANEOUS_MAX].value[0];
>                 while (sim_effects < 2) {
>                         if (i++ > 20) {
>                                 printk(KERN_WARNING "hid-pidff: device reports "
>                                        "%d simultaneous effects\n",
>                                        sim_effects);
>                                 break;
>                         }
>                         debug("pid_pool requested again");
>                         usbhid_submit_report(hid, pidff->reports[PID_POOL],
>                                           USB_DIR_IN);
>                         usbhid_wait_io(hid);
>                 }
>         }
> 

That code looks a little bit wonky indeed. It has been like that 
apparently for ages.

Adding Anssi to CC.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux